SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (13122)10/19/2004 1:54:23 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
X the Unknown,

Re: And you keep saying it- as if repetition makes your "beliefs" real.

It is interesting to me to see that the right wing extremists are completely unraveling right before our very eyes.

When we read these people in 2000 or 2001, they seemed to have an agenda that was at least in part based upon some perceived need to re-direct and rationalize national policies.

Today, we see just how pathetically inept these right wingers actually are. They've mired our great nation in a catastrophe of an occupation that is costing literally the arms and legs and lives of Americans, as well as a king's ransom.

And everyday new lies are exposed, new frauds unearthed, new corruption discovered.

And what is the response of the right wingnuts? To utterly and completely disregard reality, and succor themselves with the claptrap of their religious delusions. Suckers, indeed. The epidemic cranial-rectalitis of the likes of Brumar will be written in the history books and psychology texts for the next 500 years as a classic example of the madness that overwhelms societies from time to time. From the Children's Crusade to the Salem Witch Hunts, to the Jew-hunting of Hitler's henchmen... the current insanity in American bully-boy politics will live on in infamy.

-R.



To: epicure who wrote (13122)10/19/2004 9:41:48 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 20773
 
I guess you haven't been reading very well because you seem to have missed the reasons I gave for my opinions. For example, in the last post on the subject I cited Saddam's "past behavior and his record of statements and propositions made to other leaders in the region" as evidence of his likely future actions. I also cited the Duelfer report as evidence that "Saddam retained both the programs and intentions to produce WMD's in the future".

So your characterization of my beliefs as being based on faith are neither factual nor "logical".