SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (207588)10/19/2004 4:21:35 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576894
 
That's right.........we are seeing a clear example of this approach right now. When there were no WMDs nor al Qa'ida links and therefore no threats to the US, suddenly the emphasis was placed on Saddam, the bad guy......the world is a better place with him gone. And when that wasn't good enough......eventually the sanctions would have been dropped and Saddam would have rebuilt his WMDs. And when that wasn't good enough..........better to draw all the terrorists to Iraq and fight it out there.

I agree with this completely, unfortunately it wasn't the pre-war pitch.

I don't care if Saddam had zero Al Qaeda links, had zero WMDs, or had zero relationship to 9/11. His elimination is a good thing for the planet and for Iraqis and for Americans, and the only way to achieve it was through force. It's a shame you didn't write the above statement into one of George's pre-war speeches.....



To: tejek who wrote (207588)10/20/2004 10:13:21 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 1576894
 
I think the neo-cons wanted this war so much that they would have probably found some other reason to go into Iraq.



The war in Iraq was Bush's first foriegn policy priority, long before 9/11. The very first cabinet meeting focused on Saddam.

TP