Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (79534)	10/21/2004 1:47:05 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794301

>>It would be described as a coup d'etat. Well, let's assume for the sake of the argument that the Supreme Court actually erred in Bush v. Gore. Would that not be worse? I bring this up because I believe that Justice Breyer's opinion was legally more satisfactory under Florida law and federal law. Recount ALL Florida votes using an objective standard. As it was, the majority decision turned on the validity of the acts of one individual, Kathleen Harris, a Bush activist, which were endorsed by Bush's brother. Harris was, arguably, arbitrary. As was the Florida Supreme Court, only in favor of Gore.