Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (148537)	10/21/2004 3:19:34 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Believe what you will michael. In iran there is a euro effort re: nukes. In NK there are six party regional talks. What should we have done there--nuke em? In iraq there was no alternative other than so-called containment and as dulfer points out with sanctions being violated left and right and the UN corrupt, there really was no other alternative other than to live with saddam out of control at some time in the future. So there were not wmds--big deal. Want me to say it again for you--everybody including you thought he had 'em. Did bush exaggerate--sure. Did fdr exaggerate in getting us into WW2--sure. What about the gulf of tonkin, the bay of piggies. Its just not perfect michael and its not only republicans that are fuckups. mike