Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (148680)	10/22/2004 7:37:43 PM
From: Bruce L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

My Brother: You are the consummate "armchair theorist", but what support do you have for the many allegations contained in this statement? <<No matter how you turn it, it appears that the "enemy" in Vietnam was destined to win and our "protectorate South Vietnamese government" was destined to fall under the weight of too little popular support and too little commitment. >> The South Vietnamese continued for more than 2 years after we left in April 1973. During that time, the South was calm, the South Vietnamese seemingly happy with their government and their lives. Polls at the time strongly indicated that they did not want to fall under the control of the Spartan North. So where is your evidence? Bruce