Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: orkrious who wrote (20596)	10/24/2004 5:01:32 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

you may be right but fact is Clinton's administration wanted the same and started to move or hold troops in there including Northen Iraq - or, if you recall the Kobar Towers for example, or turning Yemen ports into a fueling stop for the US navy in the area,... which resulted in 17 US sailors dead ... or involvement in Somalia … not to mention other instances like Beirut barracks .... 230 Marines dead ... way before Clinton ... policy of securing energy resources has not changed for the last 20+ years. As to what is right or wrong it depends on the country economic interest ... after all wars do not start out of charity or ideals it is all about economics and power to dictate resource alocation