Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208768)	10/26/2004 6:57:47 PM
From: brushwud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575558

I think she's for soaking the rich even more, such as Prop. 63, a measure cleverly formulated so that if you're against it, you must be pro-millionnaire and anti mental-health. Right, now we need Props. 101-199 to allocate the remaining 99% of incomes over $1 million to worthy objects we'd like others to pay for. The initiative process in California is truly broken.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (208768)	10/27/2004 12:47:08 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575558

You were talking about the secularization of our culture earlier. It suddenly dawned on me that that's inevitable. If you think back 100, 200, 300 years ago, religion was much more serious and ceremonial than it is now. When I was a child, we would dress up to go to church. The few times I have gone to church in the past couple of years most people are dressed very casually.......some in jeans. Secularization of the church as well as society is inevitable IMO. An anecdotal observation: the most religious people on my street........three to be exact...all have Bush signs in front of their houses. BTW, all three came by with religious info and videos when I moved into the neighborhood. ted