Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (31932)	10/31/2004 12:58:38 PM
From: jrhana	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

I remember you stated something about how your reputation would suffer if CKG does not accomplish it's goals. I personally would hope that everyone buying or holding CKG would realize that it is a risky venture with absolutely no guarantees but the potential of a large payoff. If it does not do well, I would blame only myself for investing because I made my own decision to make it one of largest holdings. In fact my own investigation (along with my broker's) led me to make the investment. Your endorsement was comforting but not crucial. I will not blame you if CKG fails because actually all stocks are risky. I think Gold Money is entirely different. It seems to me that you have vouched for the integrity of Gold Money. That in fact the risk of Gold Money is in fact the same (or very nearly the same) as the risk of holding gold bullion. It is more convenient for which one pays a small amount of overhead. I would trust Gold Money because I trust your vouching for them. I think if Gold Money were to have a problem that would reflect negatively on you. If the product is good, I would have no problem with your being on the sale's force. Because, as I said, it is not a stock but a gold ownership equivalency. Is the above a fair assessment? Thanks