SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/3/2004 6:24:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Our Long National Nightmare Continues [from dailykos]

dailykos.com

I think Kerry is making an awful mistake. I know he must be under tremendous pressure to concede, we're at war, the country must be united, but it's wrong. I am convinced that there was massive fraud in NM, OH and FL and it's going to be swept under the rug unless we have a contemporary Woodward and Bernstein uncover the truth.

Now that Bush has this so called mandate, he's going to act quickly before he becomes a lame duck. Since he and his cronies have complete control of the Senate, the House and the Judiciary, watch for a flurry of regressive legislation that will make your head spin. With no checks and balances in place, the inmates are running the asylum.

Iraq will be a long bloody slog. Things will get worse and worse and more will die.

Thanks to our faithless President, we stand alone from the world, alone and alienated. Our credibility is on par with a used car salesman.

Osama has recruited thousands of new terrorists to his cause, fueled by their hatred of Bush and anything American. I fully expect a terrorist attack on US soil within the year. We failed to heed Osama's warning, and we will pay for it, I fear.

I guess DeLay was right. We have become a one party nation, the nation of fear mongering, right wing redneck Christians who profess to love thy neighbor only if he's not black, poor or gay.

The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. The middle class is on life support. We have two classes in this society, the rich and the working poor.

Al Gore said it best, how sheeple will follow a cause or ideal even if its shown to be against their best interest, if its packaged properly.

What a sad, sad day.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/3/2004 8:04:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Message 20729458



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/4/2004 3:01:01 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
What's Next For a Nation Deeply Divided?
______________________

World Now Stands Far Away from US

by Haroon Siddiqui

Published on Wednesday, November 3, 2004 by the Toronto Star

The election that mesmerized the world is over.
It is time to summarize the legacy of the last four years and list the priorities for the next four.

After 9/11, the world stood with America and George W. Bush. Today, it stands as far away from it, and him, as possible.

Americans were united.

Now they are deeply divided, about half and half, along political, social, cultural and religious lines.

It's apt to apply to America Lord Durham's old dictum for Canada: "Two nations warring in the bosom of a single state."

I have said that 9/11 made Canada more Canadian. More precisely, it was Bush who did so.

No act of Jean Chrétien proved more popular than his decision to sit out Bush's war on Iraq.

It also forced Paul Martin to curb his pro-American instincts to win the June 28 election, in which Stephen Harper paid a price for being pro-Bush.

Despite the CNN-ization of Canada, Canadians proved they could think for themselves.

They also refused to take dictation from our business or media elite, most of whom advocated jumping as high as the American president ordered.

Canada turned out to be the harbinger of what was coming in America: the first presidential election since Vietnam to be fought on foreign policy.

The priorities for the president are clear enough: How to extricate America out of the Iraq quagmire. How to resurrect American credibility and win back allies. How to reassert a U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict. How to stop nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Iran. How to free rural Afghanistan from the control of warlords.

There's no easy exit out of Iraq.

The spreading insurgency — 100 attacks a day on coalition forces, 160 foreign hostages seized and 900 Iraqi cadets killed — is beginning to look like Vietnam or the Algerian revolution against French colonialism.

No credible elections in Iraq are possible in January unless the country is pacified. It cannot be without risking massive bloodshed in places like Falluja. More Iraqi dead on top of the 100,000 already killed is to feed the insurgency further.

The only way out is to get out. Only question is how quickly.

Neither Bush nor John Kerry tackled the sub-text of most conflicts confronting America: how to address the grievances of the Muslim world.

Top of the list is the plight of the Palestinians.

Solving that issue will not end the crises.

But not tackling it certainly won't, as the world outside of the American-Israeli axis keeps saying.

The world wants three more American policies revisited.

American violations of human rights at home and abroad rob America of moral authority.

Bush's grand strategy of "pre-emption" stands discredited.

So does his hypothesis, stated in his otherwise sensible address to Congress nine days after 9/11: "Why do they hate us? They hate us for who we are. They hate us because we are free."

It was a good rallying cry for a grieving nation.

But as a prognosis of what went wrong, it remains a disastrous formulation. It excuses America from any self-examination.

© 2004 Toronto Star

commondreams.org



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/5/2004 11:00:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Capital expenditure outlook solid

________________________________

Updated 03:26 PM EST, Nov-2-2004

With respect to investment in equipment and software, although we do not know with certainty just how rapidly technology is changing and how much businesses are expecting to sell and produce in the future, a number of indicators can help explain recent trends and likely developments. At this point, although there is uncertainty, these indicators on balance suggest that the outlook in this sector is relatively positive.

Regarding nonresidential structures, the mixed indicators are a distinct improvement over the negative outlook of a few years ago. And regarding business inventories, the recent upturn in inventory investment does not appear to be problematic, but it seems unlikely that further inventory investment will impart significant forward momentum to the economy.

In short, although the economy may not experience the outsized growth rates of high-tech equipment spending or other business investment seen in the late 1990s, the fundamental features of the current U.S. economy argue for solid increases in the capital expenditures needed to produce and facilitate sales. With steady contributions from business investment, GDP growth is likely to continue expanding at a good pace, leading to further job gains and increases in family incomes.

— Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson Jr. in remarks Oct. 26 in Charleston, S.C.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/5/2004 12:51:52 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Dollar Falls On Fears of U.S. Deficits
___________________________________________

By Paul Blustein and Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, November 5, 2004
washingtonpost.com

The dollar continued its decline in global currency markets yesterday, intensifying worries among some economists that mounting U.S. budget and trade deficits could send the U.S. currency into a tailspin.

But John B. Taylor, the Treasury undersecretary for international affairs, defended the Bush administration view that the deficits pose no danger of a dollar collapse. He issued a detailed rebuttal of what he called "scare stories."

The dollar fell yesterday to within a fraction of a cent of its all-time low against the euro of $1.2930 , trading as low as $1.2898 before rallying slightly to close at $1.2867. It fell modestly against the Japanese yen, and continued a sharp slide against the Canadian dollar, which rose to 83 U.S. cents yesterday for the first time in 12 years.

It was the second straight day that the dollar has fallen despite a surge in the stock market, continuing a trend that began in early October when it started slipping against the currencies of major U.S. trading partners. The declined rekindled the fears of some analysts that the dollar could be headed for a severe sell-off unless the White House and Congress make a major effort to shrink the budget gap.

"As the dust settles after the U.S. elections, the one theme that is developing is the growing recognition [in the markets] of the need for more dollar depreciation," economists at J.P. Morgan told clients yesterday, citing as one major reason the likelihood that "there will be no serious new policies to trim the U.S. budget deficit."

Behind such sentiments is the belief that the U.S. economy is too dependent on foreign investors, and that they may balk at pouring money into U.S. securities if the country's debt continues to soar. Foreigners have provided much of the money the government borrows to cover its deficit, which was $413 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30.

"One of the big drivers in the whole big picture the markets are looking at now is our being dependent on foreign sources of funds," said David Solin, managing partner at Foreign Exchange Analytics in Essex, Conn. "Obviously, if the foreigners step back [from investing in U.S. bonds and stocks], there are going to be serious problems, not only for the dollar, but for all financial markets."

The trade deficit also creates a dependence on money from abroad because many foreigners supplying goods to the United States take the dollars they receive and effectively lend them to the United States. The simplest example of such lending is their purchase of U.S. government bonds.

Because of concerns that the United States is too much in debt, the rise in the trade gap, which is running at an anual rate of about $600 billion, also raises the specter that foreigners might dump U.S. holdings.

Those scenarios were dismissed as fanciful by Taylor, who spoke yesterday at an American Enterprise Institute seminar on the current account deficit, the broadest measure of the trade gap.

The large influx of foreign money shows that "sound, growth enhancing economic policies are continuing to make the U.S. an attractive place to invest," he said.

Taylor said administration policies already in place will help shrink the trade deficit. One is President Bush's pledge to cut the budget deficit in half, as a percentage of the U.S. gross domestic product, by 2009. That would decrease the trade deficit because lower government spending or higher taxes would reduce the amount of money consumers spend on imported goods.

Taylor pointed out that the Treasury is also prodding foreign governments to achieve faster economic growth, which should increase demand for U.S. exports, and it is trying to persuade China to change its fixed-exchange rate policy by allowing its currency, the yuan, to rise. A higher yuan would be likely to slow the flood of Chinese goods into the U.S. market because those products would become more expensive for U.S. consumers.

"Even if those policies take some time" to reduce the trade deficit, Taylor said, "there is no reason to think there will be problems in the meantime" in continuing to obtain enough money to cover the gap.

Taking issue with analysts who have voiced concern about a recent drop in investment by foreigners in U.S. Treasury bonds, Taylor said: "It is important to put the current account in the perspective of the total amount of financial flows crossing U.S. borders in large, open and flexible markets."

He cited the fact that the current account deficit increased by $19 billion in the second quarter even though government data showed a decline of about $180 billion in purchases of U.S. assets by both foreign central banks and private investors. The U.S. economy experienced no turbulence because U.S. buyers in effect replaced the foreigners.

Taylor's views were seconded by some of the other speakers at the seminar, including Allan H. Meltzer, a professor at Carnegie-Mellon University. But others maintained that the current account gap is certain to drive the dollar down one way or another -- either gently and gradually, or suddenly and sharply. Although a gradual move downward would help the economy by boosting exports, it would erode U.S. living standards below what they would be by making imported goods more expensive.

President Bush's news conference yesterday did little to lessen concerns over the deficits, Wall Street analysts and currency traders said. Bush simultaneously promised not to raise taxes under the guise of tax simplification, to pursue a costly restructuring of Social Security and to cut the budget deficit in half by 2009.

The currency markets aren't buying it, said William G. Gale, an economist at the Brookings Institution.

White House officials "have Alan Greenspan to help keep interest rates down, but they can't control the foreign exchange markets," Gale said. "I think investors are acting appropriately."



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/7/2004 1:31:43 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
The Next Bush Recession

investorsinsight.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/8/2004 11:32:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Euro Reaches New High Against U.S. Dollar
____________________________________________

Euro Currency Reaches New High Against U.S. Dollar, Puts Pressure on Europe's Economic Recovery

By David Rising, Associated Press Writer
Monday November 8, 5:34 pm ET
biz.yahoo.com

BERLIN (AP) -- The euro surged to an all-time high of $1.2987 Monday, putting pressure on Europe's largely export-driven economic recovery and prompting European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet to call the rise "brutal" in an attempt to stem the tide.

The 12-nation currency broke its previous record of $1.2962, set Friday, riding higher on concerns over oil prices and the U.S. trade and budget deficits.

"The recent moves, which tend to be brutal on the exchange markets between the euro and the U.S dollar, are not welcome from the standpoint of the ECB," Trichet said after a meeting in Basel, Switzerland.

Trichet also used the word "brutal" in a temporarily successful attempt to slow the euro's rise in January.

After the new high Monday morning, the euro dropped following Trichet's remarks. In late New York trading, the euro was worth $1.2911.

The euro, launched in 1999, slumped to less than a dollar for about 2 1/2 years between 2000 and mid-2002. It's now 57 percent above its all-time low against the dollar of 82 cents from October 2000.

French Finance Minister Nicholas Sarkozy urged the American government to take action. Speaking in Rome after meeting with the Italian industry minister, Sarkozy said the United States should remember a February statement it signed in Florida with the six other G-7 countries that warned excess exchange rate volatility could hurt economic growth.

"The U.S. must cut its budget deficit: This is an unanimous message from Europe and the International Monetary Fund which we're sending to our American friends," the financial wire Radiocor quoted Sarkozy as saying.

Rob Nichols, a U.S. Treasury Department spokesman, said the country's strong dollar policy remains unchanged and "with regard to the budget deficit, we have laid out a plan to cut it in half in five years. We are committed to the plan. We are achieving that plan."

The euro's strength harms European exporters by making their goods less competitive on price in the United States -- and could threaten the euro zone's moderate economic recovery, which has been propped up by exports while consumers at home remain reluctant to spend. The dollar's slide, meanwhile, helps U.S. exporters because their products become cheaper for foreigners.

People who work for American companies overseas and earn dollars have been hit hard by the rise in the euro. It also raises costs for Americans on vacation in Europe and burdens businesses that rely on tourism, such as hotels and restaurants.

On the other hand, the high euro has helped insulate European businesses and consumers against the recent rise in world oil prices, since oil is priced in dollars.

Martin Huefner, chief economist for Munich's HypoVereinsbank, welcomed Trichet's statement, saying "this is the kind of thing we should do" to help keep the euro in check.

He said Trichet's comments, however, were directed more at addressing the speed of the euro's recent spike than the current level.

"He is saying we don't like that kind of momentum," Huefner said. "I would interpret it that if this level is going to continue, around $1.30, then the economy can live with that. But if the pace of revaluation is going to continue, that would mean $1.40 by the end of the year and that is absolutely intolerable."

Because Trichet recognizes that danger, Huefner said he sees the ECB doing everything it can to make sure the euro does not hit the $1.40 mark before the end of next year.

Huefner said he believed the ECB would limit its attempts to control the speed of the rally to mere verbal intervention, instead of actively intervening by selling currency reserves. "This is nothing the Europeans are considering," he said.

Economists say sentiment has turned so strongly against the dollar that positive news about the U.S. economy -- such as strong labor market figures Friday -- has little impact on its slide.

One factor is the re-election of President George W. Bush and the prospect of his policies continuing for another four years. Bush's administration has run up the deficit, which weighs on the dollar. Additionally, many analysts believe the White House, although Bush hasn't said so explicitly, has been happy to see a weaker dollar, since it helps U.S. exporters and helps save jobs and growth.

Michael Schubert, an economist at Commerzbank in Frankfurt, said he expected the euro to rise "at least 1 or 2 cents" more.

"It's kind of a herd instinct," based on negative sentiment generated in recent weeks as oil prices hit new highs, Schubert said.

While French President Jacques Chirac said Friday he was "a little bit worried" by the dollar's weakness, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said he saw no reason for "serious concern."

Meanwhile, in late New York trading, the dollar was mixed against other major currencies. The dollar bought 105.51 Japanese yen, down from 105.65 Friday; 1.1819 Swiss francs, up from 1.1776; and 1.1928 Canadian dollars, down from 1.1976. The British pound was worth $1.8543, down from $1.8563.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (65436)11/10/2004 10:53:49 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
The Crushing of Fallujah Will Not End the War in Iraq
______________________________

By Patrick Cockburn
The Independent U.K.
Tuesday 09 November 2004

It is likely to be as disappointing in terms of ending the resistance as the capture of Saddam.

The belligerent trumpetings of the US Marines bode ill for Fallujah. Sgt Major Carlton W Kent, the senior enlisted marine in Iraq, told troops that the battle would be no different from Iwo Jima. In an analogy the Pentagon may not relish, he recalled the Tet offensive in Vietnam in 1968 and added: "This is another Hue city."

American voters last week never seemed to take on board the extent of the US military failure in Iraq. The rebel control of Fallujah, half an hour's drive from Baghdad, was the most evident symbol of this. It was as if a British government in London had been forced to watch as an enemy force occupied Reading for six months.

The US army ceded control of much of western Iraq during the Sunni uprising last April. Its failure to recover fully from this setback underlines the extent to which the US as a military power has proved itself much weaker than the rest of the world had assumed before the invasion of Iraq last year.

There is no doubt that the US can recapture Fallujah, if only by blowing most of it up. But this is unlikely to have much of an effect on the guerrilla war in central and northern Iraq which continues to escalate. It is still unclear how far the rebels will stand and fight against the massed firepower of the marines and the US air force. They know they are far more effective in launching pin-prick attacks with roadside bombs and suicide bombers.

The recapture of Fallujah is likely to be as disappointing in terms of ending the resistance as was the capture of Saddam Hussein last December or the hand-over of sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government at the end of June. Each event was billed as a success which would tip the balance towards the US. Instead the fighting got bloodier and more widespread.

There should be no mystery about why this is happening. All countries object to being occupied. Foreign invasions provoke nationalist resistance. This has happened with extraordinary speed in Iraq because of the ineptitude of the US civil and military commanders, but in the long term it would have happened anyway.

The US in Iraq has always behaved as if the resistance was fomented by foreign powers or adherents of Saddam Hussein. A lesson of the ground war last year was that few Iraqis were prepared to get killed for their old leader. Earlier this year I asked American helicopter pilots operating from a base near Fallujah whom they thought they were fighting. They said firmly that they were at war with "FFs" and "FRLs". These turned out to be Foreign Fighters and Former Regime Loyalists. One of the pilots added nervously that there seemed to be a third somewhat shadowy group "who want us to go home".

The US and the British are trying to seize Fallujah and the central Euphrates cities . These may have been the original heartlands of the rebellion, but today there are guerrilla attacks in every Sunni region in Iraq. US and interim government control of Baghdad is limited.

One of the strangest justifications for the attack on Fallujah is that it will allow an election to take place. This would only be true if the Sunni rebellion was a mirage and was entirely the work of FFs and FRLs oppressing a local population yearning to break free. A much more likely result of an increase in the fighting is a boycott of the election by the Sunnis. Even if they do vote then there is no reason to suppose that the guerrillas will stop fighting any more than the IRA laid down its arms despite numerous elections in Northern Ireland in the 1970s and 1980s.

The election will take place in January and voting will be heavy because Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the Shia religious leader, wants the Shia to show at the polls that they are 60 per cent of the population. The Kurds, who total another 20 per cent, will also take part. But Sistani has made clear ever since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein that he is against the occupation and has steadfastly refused to meet American officials. The Sunni, another 20 per cent of the population, have shown that they are strong enough to destabilize Iraq just as long as they want to. (The Kurds, with a similar proportion of the population, were able to destabilize Iraq for almost half a century.)

It is worth remembering that the elections are taking place largely because of armed resistance. Until guerrilla war started in the summer of last year US officials in Baghdad were speaking airily of an American occupation going on for years. It was only as the military situation deteriorated by the week that the US suddenly decided to appoint an interim government and hold elections. Many Iraqis say quietly that the only way to get concessions from the Americans is to shoot at them.

The French failed to hold Algeria against a nationalist revolt despite fielding an army of half a million. With similar numbers the US failed in Vietnam. With a much smaller army in Iraq, it will fail again. As in Algeria and Vietnam, the war in Iraq will only cease when an end to the occupation is in sight.

-------

truthout.org