Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (151206)	11/6/2004 10:50:00 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Albright should review it now. Perhaps she should speak to it, and answer why she didn't acknowledge it in 1999...or 2000.... then you said in reply: >>>>The big question is, what to do about them?<<<< I think it is VERY important to figure out why Albright and Clinton didn't respond to this report..... If they had responded in a much more forceful way (non-militarily forceful) it is possible that 5 years down stream we wouldn't have to dealing with the bigger problem now. However, I think the Bush Admin is correct in working through a much bigger leverage with China.....China after all, is VERY close to this narcissist NK murderer.... And don't doubt that he has more weapons and more money than they will admit... When you read more of that report, you will notice what the effect of our aid to NK has been....The citizens are starving, and the millions of soldiers are fed and have weapons.