SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (29317)11/6/2004 5:45:54 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
It's going to come out that Bush campaign used voter fraud of all kinds and stole the election.

Yeah, right....and Elvis and his alien baby will "break" the story.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

What a freakin' moron you are......



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (29317)11/6/2004 7:27:25 PM
From: Ron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Interesting suggestion from John Dvorak about computerized voting machines:

Here is the scenario. A person would cast his or her vote. At the end a small two-part slip of paper would be printed from a small bar-code printer hooked to the machine or even a more centralized printer.

The small print-out would have a voter receipt on one half and a bar code on the other that would represent the votes cast by the voter. The voter would tear this in half and place the bar code in a ballot box and keep the other half.

There would be a bar-code reader in the room to validate the votes if the voter was concerned about accuracy. The sealed ballot box containing all the bar-coded little pieces of paper would be the paper trail and final back up for serious audits of districts.

It would only be used for recounts, catastrophic system failures and spot checks as needed. Most of the time, it would never be looked at. But it would be there just in case. Currently there is no paper trail and with computers it's needed badly.

If Diebold and the other companies are smart they'll add this inexpensive feature and allow everyone to sleep just a little better at night, knowing that the cheaters can't as easily cheat.
-----
It does seem rather absurd, that in an era when you get paper printouts for everything from automated grocery scanners to post office vending machines and gas pumps... we have not gotten around to requiring paper receipts for something as important as voting.
---------
I don't really subscribe to the "we wuz robbed" scenario this time around. Although let the investigations run their course and see what happens. I do subscribe to the obvious fact that the Democrats underestimated the power of social issues and getting out the fundamentalist vote. But lack of accountability for computerized voting in the future sure could be a huge thing to deal with, whether you are conservative, moderate or liberal.



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (29317)11/7/2004 12:15:02 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
The dems have been cheating at elections forever, look at Mayor Daley in the 60s without his cheating Kennedy would never become Pres. I donb't see you libs crying about that. Looka t Phillie, Balt, christ every major city the dems vote 1000s of dead people. God are you NAIVE