Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (660295)	11/14/2004 8:17:37 PM
From: E	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

I despise their atrocities. I don't call them anything but monstrous. No one here is defending them, though. You and others are defending the indefensible. china.org.cn C'mon, J.C. Just answer these few little questions. I'd really like to know your views on them. I omitted the Hawaii anomaly so it's only five questions: 1) what about the active, vocal, Nazi Hitler-loving Bund? What about the German-Americans who weren't even born here, like my grandparents? Nobody bothered them. Why is that? 2) why weren't the prisoners' assets protected? Their homes, their livelihoods, if it was felt to be necessary for "security" to imprison thousands of families? Should they have been impoverished as well as imprisoned, iyo? 3) why was the study that had been done demonstrated a high degree of loyalty among Japanese-Americans kept secret? do you think it was right to keep it secret? 4) what do you think about the conditions in which the families were kept? Did the harsh conditions improve our security? 5) if Army Intelligence, the FBI, and the Justice Department all opposed it, why do you think it was necessary for our country's security to imprison under harsh conditions and strip of their assets thousands of loyal Americans?