Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (211743)	11/15/2004 4:12:07 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

However, that does not mean that it is in our nation's interest to have anti-war activists meeting with the enemy. It may not constitute treason, but is more in the category of the Hanoi Jane incident -- reflecting a great deal of irresponsibility on Kerry's part. And some naivte, as well. 1- It is in our nation's best interest to have constant critical examination of our nation's political position. 2- It's fine for anti-war activists to meet with our nation's enemies, depending on what happens at the meetings. A meeting implies discussion, which is good. As long as the anti-war activist doesn't endanger the US's interests during the meeting the meeting in and of itself is not wrong. What else is the idea of an opposing party/viewpoint if the people with the opposing view are not given the ability to express themselves? In other words, what is someone who objects to the Vietnam war supposed to do when given the opportunity to meet with the Vietnamese leadership? What's your alternative proposal?