Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (211753)	11/15/2004 4:06:24 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574849

Whether Kerry was treasonous probably depends upon 2 issues, either of which, would have made it treason; You evidently don't understand the meaning of the word "depends", or you have poor grammatical skills. Go back to high school and practice subject predicate.... what was discussed, and did Kerry know he still was in the navy, subject to its rules and regulations. As long as Kerry didn't promote anti-American activities during this meeting, it doesn't matter to me whether he knew he was in the Navy or not when I determine if meeting the Viet Cong government reps was treason. Kerry didn't release his notes on the meetings, and I have no idea how clearly the navy briefs their personal, upon discharge from active duty, what their obligations are for their period of inactive duty. Yeah, so? To state that his meetings were treasonous without any knowledge of what was discussed at the meetings is.....in my opinion.....stupid. The fact that the navy didn't prosecute Kerry, doesn't necessarily mean they were, or weren't traitorous, as political considerations probably were more paramount. Well I can take the US government's view, or your view, and I'll choose the US government's. He wasnt even charged, so this discussion is a waste of our time.