SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BWAC who wrote (12070)11/17/2004 9:10:40 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
> Since WHEN was a litigation settlement part of ongoing operations???? <

You fail to understand modern accounting.

The company was operating on an ongoing basis. Sometime during that ongoing operation, they happened to run into a favorable tax ruling and a beneficial litigation settlement. Since, as I said, operations were ongoing at the time, it is clear that these earnings were part of ongoing operations.

On the other hand, if they had faced an unexpected negative tax ruling, or had lost a lawsuit, these clearly would have been unusual, one-time events that definitely took place outside the course of normal business. As such, they would need to be excluded from the earnings that resulted from ongoing operations, because those operations had nothing whatsoever to do with them.

Is that clear?

mg



To: BWAC who wrote (12070)11/17/2004 9:51:25 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 25522
 
"Since WHEN was a litigation settlement part of ongoing operations????"

since today (g)



To: BWAC who wrote (12070)11/17/2004 9:56:19 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25522
 
Since WHEN was a litigation settlement part of ongoing operations????

I believe the settlement was related to royalty payments due, and thus it would be a part of ongoing operations.......or phrased better, should have been in prior Q's.