SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (86845)11/18/2004 8:43:46 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793549
 
Anfal might have been relatively primitive. Primitive doesn't mean "low power", esp. if primitive is combined with massive.

Tim



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (86845)11/22/2004 10:59:36 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793549
 

Saddam's previously displayed chemical warfare capabilities were hardly primitive.

Primitive doesn’t mean ineffective. A primitive CBW capacity can be very devastating, especially when deployed against an undefended or poorly defended civilian population. Saddam’s efforts to use his WMD against Iranian forces – hardly a technologically sophisticated army – did not prove terribly effective.