Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (298112)	11/19/2004 3:48:38 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Respond to of 436258

It's a tough situation he's in.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (298112)	11/19/2004 7:05:21 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>>>.....(still doesn't mean the decision to be there in the first place is correct, though.....)<< What finally is very clear is that Iraq did not attack the United States and that Iraq was not making any preparations to attack the United States, nor was it helping or protecting anyone with such intent. There was therefore no excuse for unilateral action by the United States against Iraq, and there was no international mandate, law, or precedent for the United States to change Iraq's government, evil as it was. This entire adventure has been carried out with great unwisdom. The United States is now loathed by most of the Muslim world, and the action is condemned by the entire rest of the world except for a dwindling minority in England and aa few other scattered centers of sympathy.