SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aladin who wrote (87268)11/19/2004 4:09:49 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794521
 

The most overtly racist place I have ever lived or worked in was Boston. It was unexpected.


I remember the problems Boston had--they made the national news and dragged on and on--and being surprised by them. I was living in the south for the first time in my life at the time and getting a taste of that. Nasty business, it was.

His comment was Liberal racism is what he sees in Boston. To liberals racism only exists in the South or inner cities.

OK, I'll accept that.

But, for the record, "liberal racism" is a term of art and it doesn't refer to that. That's plain, old-fashioned, regular racism, the kind that looks down on and discriminates against blacks, aka conservative racism. Liberal racism is the term given to the kind of backhanded racism inherent in liberal policies and attitudes that assume that blacks can't compete even up.

There was mention of googling so I assumed that's the context in which the term was being used, that plus the examples.

If you google on "liberal racism," the first item returned is a book by that title: Liberal Racism: How Fixating on Race Subverts the American Dream by Jim Sleeper.

Take a look at this godawful place in which C. Rice is taking a beating for, among other things, her looks and her scholarly achievements ["affirmative action baby"].

That example is one of "conservative racism," which likewise can be practiced by liberals.

The examples cited of Rice and Bush's baby are not racism at all but rather politics as usual. However, taking those comments as racist is a companion of liberal racism--the automatic finding of racism in any criticism of a black person.

If this is going to be the hot topic moenmac expects it to be, we need to get our terminology squared away.



To: aladin who wrote (87268)11/19/2004 4:23:39 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 794521
 
I've lived in eight U.S. cities and spent a good amount of time in about a fifty others. Boston is no more racist than any other big city IMO. Of course, forced busing, where white students from South Boston were shuttled to Roxbury and black students from Roxbury were shuttled to South Boston, disturbed the delicate racial balance of the city starting in the 1970s. White flight followed.

BTW, the Celtics were the first team in NBA history to hire a black head coach.



To: aladin who wrote (87268)11/19/2004 8:30:54 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794521
 
I've never been to Boston, but I've seen more racism in the New York area than in VA. Most of the racism that I saw in NY wasn't violent repressive angry racism, but just a casual thing, sometimes expressed only vaguely. There didn't seem to be hatred behind it but just a vague air of racial superiority/inferiority., combined with statements like "this used to be a good neighborhood before it "went black".

Tim



To: aladin who wrote (87268)11/19/2004 9:42:03 PM
From: pheilman_  Respond to of 794521
 
John,

Agree on Atlanta. When I last visited it was the most race-neutral place. As I was flying away I got into a conversation with a black guy that was planning on leaving California as soon as possible to move to Atlanta and he agreed on how balanced the area seemed.

It is probably related to how fast the city is growing.

Paul