Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (56278)	11/22/2004 2:24:55 AM
From: Seeker of Truth	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74559

Hello Taikun, The what!! "US is shouldering the responsibility for policing the world". Most people on this globe, certainly including me, see the US as making the world a more dangerous place. I wish they would get out of the middle east and stop shouldering anything. Of course our investment policies have to be based on reality, which is that investment in the policeman is dangerous especially when we need protection against him. The big trend is down for the currency of this policeman. The UN should have a police force, carefully chosen. That's a totally different matter. Everything would be better, even for your KEP if the US kept its nose out of Syria, Iran, North Korea, Palestine etc.

To: Taikun who wrote (56278)	11/24/2004 12:37:56 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

D, re: the Nafta correct... and you forgot the GST... the two cornerstones securing the election were reneged upon... OTOH as far the US policing the world I gotta go with Malcolm on that one... Afghanistan was valid... but Iraq ? On the Missile defense ? NO WAY... too much sovereignty at stake... besides are the Russians already working on a 'work around' and I don't know how good US missile defence could be anyway... good as the Patriot Missiles :o) regards K