Jeff, as usual, you are wrong. The researcher responsible for discovering the ties between Khashoggi and Tony Elgindy is one of the premiere Iran-Contra researchers in the world. She is currently assisting Gerald Posner (Why America Slept) on 9/11 timelines. But you already know this. Today you insist it is Dobry, but that wasn't what you emailed the researcher on November 16th, 2002 on behalf of Tony, was it?
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Mitchell
To: XXXXXXXXXXX
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: Heads Up
Ms. XXXXXXX, I found it quite interesting that Michael Ruppert's now
discredited information mirrored something XXXXX XXXXX wrote in the
summer. A few quick searches on Google and it became obvious your role
in all this. Whether the "research" originated from you, Deaner, or
Dobry is immaterial to me. What is material is that I see my name --
erroneously and libelously -- linked to your group's delusional thinking
you have uncovered some mob run global financial conspiracy. Do I think
writing this letter will change your mind? No. Not at all. In fact,
knowing the way XXXX and XXXXX think, they'll insist they struck a nerve,
I'm worried, scared, etc., and be even more convinced than ever they
are correct. You know what? I really don't care what they think. The
entire point of this short note is to tell you I and my attorney are now
holding you equally responsible for material emanating from XXXX and
XXXXX. I've also alerted Tony Elgindy (who I only know from SI, btw, not
that you'll believe me) in the event he or his attorney may find use
for it somehow. Consider this a heads up.
- Jeff
-----------------
You're a good Elgindy sheep, always wrong factually, but always willing to put persons, particulary women, in harms' way;
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony@Pacific [mailto:dow-XXXXXX.XXX]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:03 PM
To: Michael C. Ruppert
Cc: amy cutson
Subject: Re: Acknowledgement
IM assuming based on the very limited time ive spent on this issue
that your source is a nutcase named Dobry, all libel
Friday, November 15, 2002 4:16 PM ET
To: Anthony@Pacific
From: Jeff Mitchell
Not that you need a smoking gun, but here it is. Technopulp is XXXXX XXXXX, XXXX XXXXX's partner in lunacy. Note that the original post has stuff underlined and in bold.
----------------
Ruppert appears to have a nasty habit using other person's research. The research was sound. He used it. You were able to use google to find the researchers email address to contact her with threats of lawsuits, but you weren't able to use to it to find Ruppert's very public ranting against this researcher after you and Tony started strong-arming him for a retraction?
The research was sound. I have all of Ruppert's emails detailing his only concern at the time, Elgindy and his sheep hurting the release/sales of his book. If you'd like them made public, just say so.
--------------------
Here is what the researcher said of Ruppert;
Check this out! Mike Ruppert began to send my e-mail from some list serve he added
me to without my consent of course, bashing Barbara Honegger. He just termed me
a psycho, irrational and hysterial because I said I am deleting his access to my e-mail
with an anti-spam program.
Look at him -- I never said "entire list serve" I said "list serve" ... he's just like xxxxxx
xxxxx! He's bashing me everywhere. What he wrote is a complete lie -- I can even send
you want he sent me, and I have no idea why he suddenly put me in his list-serve on
his issues with Alex. Jones. And indeed, he put Honeggar with Alex Jones and envisoned
this conspiracy against him between Barbara Honegger and an attorney named Hilton.
He's whacked out. But this is what he calls me -- a psycho, irrational and hysterical
person ... he omitted from his string below his vituperous e-mail me terming me simply
"irrational and hysterical" and now adds psycho to a one-liner! Later he would try to
turn around and reverse this, like to say "oh, I mean Alex Jones or Stanley Hilton
are psycho, irrational, and hysterical! He is a sick-o. He now also a big friend of
"insider" Khaled Elgindy whom he thinks got a hugely unfair shake by Cynthia
McKinney whom he also referred to as irrational for "firing him." She let go her
entire campaign staff that same day.
-------------------------
You might read WING TV's piece on Rupprt as well;
Mike Ruppert Unmasked
by Victor Thorn - October 1, 2004
Note: The following is a profile of Mike Ruppert, the man. It should not be taken as an indictment of his book, Crossing the Rubicon (released last week), which I have not yet had an opportunity to review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Sometimes pointing out that one was right is not about ego”
Mike Ruppert
On this date – Friday, August 6, 2004 – the world was the same as it was any other day – filled with allegations, suspicions, criticism and threatening lawsuits. Even crazy old Dick Eastman entered the fray. Yes, this was the world of Mike Ruppert – king of the conspiratologists, perpetual center of attention, and legend in his own mind.
So, I figured: it’s time to figure out what makes Mike Ruppert tick – to see what he’s all about. Sure, I already knew the basics --- LAPD cop quits the force, enters a mental institution, chases some crazy broad around the country, struggles through tough times, turns whistleblower, confronts CIA Director John Deutsch in South Central L.A., begins From the Wilderness, and releases his Truth and Lies of 9-11 on video.
But there had to be more, especially when the Internet was buzzing with so many rumors about Ruppert – the whispers developing into deafening echoes. From my perspective, there were only two courses of action. I could either unquestioningly buy into all the gossip, or investigate this matter for myself.
Mind you, I had never spoken directly to Mike Ruppert, nor had I ever even corresponded with him via e-mail. The only “contact” I ever had with Ruppert was via a review that I had written about his 9-11 video, which later appeared in my book, The New World Order Exposed.
All this changed on Friday, August 6, 2004 when I noticed that Ruppert was threatening to sue 9-11 researcher Dick Eastman. (I can’t remember exactly what this lawsuit entailed, but I’m pretty sure it revolved around an argument they were having about whether or not a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on the morning of 9-11.) Anyway, my first thought was: how many people has Mike Ruppert threatened to bring lawsuits against now? But then an even better idea popped into my mind: why don’t I invite Ruppert and Eastman onto WING TV and get both sides of the story.
So, without further delay, I reeled off an e-mail to Ruppert inviting him to appear on WING TV. In addition, I also addressed some of the innuendo and outright accusations surrounding him:
“We have been receiving tons of e-mail in the past few months that are seriously calling into question your validity and honesty as a 9-11 researcher. Some of the claims being made are that you are a PATRIOT FOR HIRE (in other words, just in it for the money), and that you have sold out (i.e. a cop on the take). Finally, others are saying that you are deliberately covering up what actually happened on 9-11 by steering people away from it toward peak oil. These things are definitely not going unnoticed, and we would like your take on these matters.”
Before proceeding any further, I would like to make a few things perfectly clear. First, this was a private e-mail from me to Mike Ruppert, and was not posted in any other forums. In fact, I have never criticized Mr. Ruppert on any Internet group or in any discussion rooms. Thus, my note remained solely between him and me.
Well, about two hours later, right before Lisa Guliani and I were about to eat supper, the phone rang. I answered it, only to hear Mike Ruppert on the other end. After introducing himself in a very surly fashion, Ruppert growled that he was RECORDING this conversation for legal reasons; and that if I didn’t cease-and-desist in my threats and slander toward him, he would proceed to take immediate legal action! Yup, you guessed it – my name was now added to an already lengthy list of people Mike Ruppert was threatening to sue.
Anyway, after listening to Ruppert rant, rave, and swear about Dick Eastman and how sick he was of people questioning his motives, I assured him that I didn’t even remotely slander or threaten him. Rather, I repeated some of the charges being leveled against him; then invited him onto our show to address these issues. That, I explained, was what responsible reporters and journalists do instead of simply shooting from the hip like a cowboy. I even went on to say that it would be real easy for us to appear on WING TV and repeat these rumors, but such tactics would be unfair to him; thus, the invitation.
Well, after somewhat calming Ruppert down (twenty minutes later), I asked him once again if he would like to appear on our show; to which he responded that I would have to contact his representative, Ken Levine. I agreed to do so, and after hanging up the telephone, I commented to Lisa, “That’s the angriest and most paranoid man I’ve ever spoken to.” This ended chapter one of my interaction with Mike Ruppert.
Shortly thereafter I turned on my computer to find an e-mail from Ruppert where he once again threatened to sue me:
“I sent out the following statement to Eastman yesterday. If you or he represent my position in any other way than what I say here, you can rest assured that legal action will follow, and quickly.”
[As a sidebar, I have never spoken directly to Mr. Dick Eastman in my life, and have e-mailed him less than half-a-dozen times. Thus, any implied relation is non-existent.]
Ruppert then went on to explain his views on the 9-11 terrorist attacks, specifically where he stood in regard to what hit (or did not hit) the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001. He only did so, though, after telling me, “This is addressed on my website, if you are intelligent enough to find it.” I mention this point because, as you will see later in this essay, it is indicative of Mike Ruppert’s modus operandi where he feels compelled to take nasty, abusive pot-shots at those who he views as detractors.
Anyway, for the next three weeks I periodically spoke with Mr. Ken Levine and tried to schedule Ruppert for WING TV. The results, though, were less than optimal, for Levine kept “fluffing me off” and running hot-and-cold with me. Even after hearing how we were booking the hottest names in the 9-11 field (including Dave von Kleist, John Kaminski, George Humphrey, Eric Hufschmid, Phil Jayhan, Jim Hoffman, Michael Elliott and Ian Barksdale), along with numerous presidential candidates, Levine wouldn’t commit; instead telling me he’d keep working on it. (This point is important to remember, as you’ll soon see.)
Finally, on August 31, 2004, I decided to go directly to the source once again, and thus sent the following e-mail to Mike Ruppert:
Full article at: 69.28.73.17
To funny, Ruppert can't even figure out Elgindy was lying about not being in any lawsuits when the news of his arrest was everywhere and really didn't know McKinney's whole CAIR-infested staff was let go, including Tony's brother.
My suggestion s to you for researching Khashoggi;
1. Read Ron Kessler's "The World's Richest Man" about Khashoggi, but written before Iran Contra information broke.
It details the earlier life of Khashoggi and his role with CIA asset Kermit "Kim" Roosevelt who brought us the Shah of Iran in 1953.
2. Read Joseph Persico's "Casey" which details the life of Casey, his "contracting" of Adnan Khashoggi as a CIA contractor in 1981,
and testimony from Iran-Contra hearings where indeed Khashoggi's name frequently appeared for his role in handling arms. Not even
Khashoggi disputed this. There are also various references to Khashoggi's "Triad" and "Triad America" corporations. See also that
he was active in Kentucky, as was Buttes Gas & Oil, available in state records there; read Sally Denton's "The Bluegrass Conspiracy"
that was originally released in 1989, and by popular demand, recently released in paperback.
3. Note in SEC records related to GenesisIntermedia, it took some time before the SEC was able to identify Ultimate Holdings Ltd. of
Bermuda as Adnan Khashoggi's investment vehicle. Note the roots of GenesisIntermedia, namely, Genesis, located in Florida records,
Tampa, formed in 1996. Tampa, FL.
4. Review a plethora of articles from the late 1980s through the early 1990s about one of Khashoggi's arms fronts operating in Miami,
Garrick Resources, and its sensitive government relationship.
5. Review records in Canada for Khashoggi's arms shipments front in Vancouver, B.C., known as Barrick Resources International,
created in 1981, aka BRI, an oil and gas driller, while a contractor for the CIA under Bill Casey.
6. Review records in Canada for Khashoggi's spin-off joined with him later later by Peter Munk, formed 1983 in Toronto, Barrick Gold.
7. Look for a book coming out by National Security News Service which does background research for all mainstream news channels
for news features: 6-time Pulitzer nominee Joe Trento, about CIA Kermit Roosevelt and fronts used, which include Adnan Khashoggi's
fronts. It will be a "Secret History of the CIA Vol. II."
These are only a few of the more commonly available resources from mainstream authors who have never been branded "conspiracy nuts" for 'true' nuts, like you.
|
