Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President George W. Bush - Right or Wrong? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (116)	11/27/2004 9:54:26 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 390

I've been forced to reach the sad conclusion that though there may have been vote fraud and voter suppression, that alone isn't enough to explain away George Bush's huge popular vote total. There really are 60 million indecent Americans who are either self-deluded, criminally insane or otherwise not worthy of the name "American" who turned out to really, really love the idea of creating a fascist Empire. How else can we explain the results? Raybo: Maybe people saw Kerry for what he was....and figured Bush was the lesser of two evils....?? The American public does not believe we are establishing a "fascist empire".......that kind of silly overheated pinhead type rhetoric doesn't advance your cause....its too obviously loony.... J.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (116)	11/27/2004 3:21:24 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 390

I think AS was paid by the Kerry campaign to campaign for Kerry on the internet. He said a few things that gave that impression when I was talking to him. But I think the idea was to appear to be "average joe" and not announce he was in the campaign. Probably a new tactic for campaigning but not a stupid one considering how many people are online. And on Bush's re-election. Canada is looking good. I keep on thinking that it's only going to get worse. I expect another major terrorist attack and then a forced registration of everyone in America into a government data base. We'll see. I think though that you see all this as coming from one party and that's where we diverge. It's both parties, and neither party. The opening salvoes were fired when Clinton was President with the massacre at Waco, Tx by government agents and then the first "fake terror" attack at the Murrah office building at Oklahoma City. I say neither party because the prime movers are not seen and they tell the Presidents what is going to happen, not the other way around. Bush is a rouge elephant in their plans but it's bigger than one party or one president.