Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wonk who wrote (21759)	12/1/2004 10:25:21 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Respond to of 32918

Hi wonk, How have you been? I haven't seen you in ages. How are things going? EK!!!

To: wonk who wrote (21759)	12/1/2004 11:34:24 PM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32918

It's really just a case of good business sense. Bob provided the heritage GF/Life users with effectively the same status they had previously, and they provide SI with a "critical mass" of users. Thats a wiw-win. The APA is between Seller and Buyer, not users. The user relationship was and is governed by the TOU, as was the case with all previous owner entities. Section 6 of the TOU has the boilerplate "as is, as available, without warranty" language. That's the defining terms, insofar as users go. Everything beyond that is goodwill and good business sense. In my opinion. :-)