Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (90528)	12/3/2004 10:18:55 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Since there were no weapons of mass destruction, since there was no real threat to the US (at least from Iraq), since Al Qaeda was not in league with Saddam, there was no real reason for the war Incorrect. Saddam was in violation of the cease fire accords at the end of the first Gulf War....he was shooting at our airmen on a daily basis, his support for terror organizations and harboring of terrorists was well known and well documented, his refusal to come clean on WMD and cooperate fully in inspections was a major issues which needed to be resolved.... In light of 9/11, the war was not only inevitable but clearly necessary.... J.