Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (153300)	12/3/2004 6:02:05 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Saddam’s nuclear ambitions were problematic. Also it is my opinion that it was necessary to clean up Iraq and develop its oil reserves prior to dealing more aggressively with Saudi Arabia’s spread of radical Wahabi Islam. * * *

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (153300)	12/3/2004 11:42:04 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

By all reports Iraq wasn't doing anything with the money that should be objectionable to us By all reports, Iraq was filling mass graves at about 30,000 people a year on average, supporting terrorist organizations all over the place, using the UN money to starve its people while paying bribes to the Russians and French to lift the sanctions, which was working. Nothing that should be objectionable to us in all this? A guy puts 300,000 or 400,000 people into mass graves (they're still counting), and it shouldn't be objectionable to us? Do you have anything to say to the modern victims of tyranny?