Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (9135)	12/4/2004 1:16:58 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > I think I'd much rather use something like the plumes of debris being ejected from the buildings a hundred feet below the collapse progression, or the behavior of the penthouse on WTC 7, than the "metal fragments" in the above photo. I don't know why you want to argue against yourself? Indeed, why consider only one piece of evidence when there are four? Or more. And how do you decide which is the "right" one -- eeny, meeny?! As far as I am concerned, (1) The spray of metal fragments, whether from the aluminum in the outer walls or the central column reinforcing-steel or both, could have arisen only as result of an explosion. I defy anyone to tell just by looking that no steel was present. (2)The plumes of debris, presumably squibs, are additional evidence. (3)The section of reinforcing steel which is buried in the wall of the building opposite (I can't put my finger on it but I'm sure you have seen the picture), is further evidence. (4) The voluminous quantity of dust, which cannot be accounted for unless a source of energy other than gravitation was present, is yet further evidence.

To: Don Earl who wrote (9135)	12/4/2004 5:47:49 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > the "metallic fragments" appear to be the same size and color as what covers the entire exterior of the building. st12.startlogic.com 911research.wtc7.net Here's the steel structure embedded in the wall of an adjoining building, which I mentioned. 911research.wtc7.net And here's my pyroclastic dust 911research.wtc7.net (Also the pages which follow) >>Each Tower Disappeared into a Volcano-like Cloud of Dust The dense dust clouds that replaced the towers resembled pyroclastic flows studied by vulcanologists. The dust clouds rapidly expanded to many times each tower's volume. The dust clouds advanced down streets at around 30 mph. The clouds were dense enough to pick up and carry people. New York Daily News photographer David Handschuh recalled: I got down to the end of the block and turned the corner when a wave-- a hot, solid, black wave of heat threw me down the block. It literally picked me up off my feet and I wound up about a block away.<<