SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hedgefundman who wrote (88548)12/5/2004 11:46:49 AM
From: Man on the moon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
awww whatsa mattaa hedgefundman, did we get upset and tell our mommy about the big bad moon man and his naughty words? LOL - if ya can't take the heat, betta step outta the sauna.

Did we work out a deal with mommy where you still get to say the bad words and I don't? Gee, that sounds like a tainted deal. Oh Well.

Contrary to your opinion, all sheeple are intact, accounted for, including me (and proud of it!).

Life would be so very boring if there wasn't a tainted aspect to it here and there, now wouldn't it be, eh? :)

I have a so very strong feeling you have trouble shorting in this market as of late. Gee just can't understand them green days can ya? Don't you love a good short squeeze? Taking out your lost $$ frustrations on the sheeple? Tell ya what, if you would like some insight into how the markets work, to help you get some of that money back, I'll give you the "former sheeple' rate of $2000 a month. Something you can be proud of and talk about, and well worth your time. I only ask that you keep a reasonable distance though, in light of your past behaviour and thoughts. Send me an email to hombreonthemoon@yahoo.com - I'll hook you up dude. Will be a great tool.

Best Regards,
MAN ON THE MOON



To: hedgefundman who wrote (88548)12/5/2004 12:01:22 PM
From: Nazbuster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
re: Can't be afraid of the truth, can we?

Look in the mirror. You and so many here are so righteous, so sure of yourselves, you are afraid that perhaps that the distortions presented in this indictment might NOT be etirely accurate.

At least you speak your own mind, unlike Petty_Girl whose intellect only knows Cut&Paste. It's pretty obvious that when she posts her own ideas, they are 100% off base. That's why I don't respond to her anymore. I simply can't be bothered being her editor. Others are doing a fine job of pointing out her ignorance.

Yet, your last post was all fluff; no content; no ideas; no worth; ALL BLEATING.. baaaa baaa baaa... with the other sheep following the easy path of assuming everything Tony is accused of is accurate. Are you prepared to come here and apologize if this trial results in an acquittal on all counts? (I'm not predicting that, but I am asking about your integrity.)

How about getting specific with your points? How about putting yourself on the line and making specific criticisms about MY comments instead of inane bleating of your own?
YOU go ahead and speak the TRUTH if you think you know it and can back up your statements with personal knowledge or references that hold credibility. I'm willing to listen.

I speak from personal experience and personal FIRST HAND observation. For example, I know that Tony's sale of his kids' trust accounts came after days of watching him whine and complain about the market conditions and how much he hated being long. Finally, he simply cried "uncle" and said he'd had it and was going to dump all the longs rather that see them slide lower every day. That's the TRUTH. The prosecution would know this since they had access to all the logs, yet they again brought up the issue in the trial.

I'll raise the challenge to YOU to tell the truth. Go ahead get started. You haven't yet.