Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nazbuster who wrote (88555)	12/5/2004 1:52:35 PM
From: hedgefundman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

MacRandy - that was a fairly objective response to mine, so I thank you for that. As I've posted before, I have no desire to heap on Anthony. Criminal convictions are tough. The standard of proof, protections, etc. The government rarely goes forward unless they feel the case is iron clad. I have nothing to add. My purpose for posting was to respond to sheeple who feel that they are insulated somehow. They fail to realize the value of the trial as discovery for future actions, likely civil. Moonman - with his inane posts, largely attacking anyone who tries to post against the party line here is reminiscent of how the sheeple would work in the past to further the work of the leader. Unfortunately for the sheeple, IMO, this will be a factor as we go forward and as the lights shine on the man in the moon, he will see that the moonman has no light of his own to generate. If the sheeple used the fruits of information obtained from the FBI data base or if the sheeple were part and parcel of any alleged extortion or if they furthered the scheme, and reasonably should have known what they were doing, then civil liabilities should be issues with which the sheeple will be dealing.