Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (153878)	12/13/2004 10:33:06 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The Iraqi Invasion was elective...The Bushies went to war because they wanted to -- they should have taken more time build a stronger coalition AND to make sure that ALL the troops would have appropriate armour and protection. How would you feel if your son or daughter had died in Iraq because they were pre-maturely sent in to the theater of war WITHOUT proper body or vehicle armour...? There is no excuse for this type of reckless management. Bush and Rumsfeld had the time to prepare. There was NO IMMINENT THREAT....War should always be a last resort and our troops should never be sent into harms way without the proper equipment. -s2@TrustButVerify.com