Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (9261)	12/13/2004 3:52:10 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > I hope there is a different photo to back it up. I'm sorry, that's the only "photo" there is. It's clearly a clip from the CNN video. The quality of the earlier copy 911research.wtc7.net is superior to mine because mine is a copy, of a copy, of a copy, of a copy. > I think you'd have a hard time making a case for it being something other than a clip of the first collapse rather than from the earlier second plane crash. As I see it, it's an independent explosion which has nothing to do with plane crashes. Hufschmid feels it has been done deliberately to release pressure. I feel it may have more to do with ensuring an insurance pay-out. >>Did high pressure punch holes in Building 6? Photos shows a plume of dust rising upwards near Buildings 5 and 6 as each tower collapsed (Figure 1-1). This dust shot upwards so quickly that it passed the top of Building 7 (nearly 600 feet tall) within a few seconds. The collapse of the towers would have pushed dust into the underground shopping mall, parking lot, and passageways, increasing the air pressure underground. These plumes of smoke might be the result of the high pressure dust blowing open a hole in or near Buildings 5 and 6, and then shooting upwards. Building 6 has two deep holes in it, and Building 5 has at least one mysterious hole. Were those holes blown open to release the high pressure?<< > If an explosive device had enough force to blow out five floors and a roof, why didn't it blow out the walls as well? Maybe there was a stair well?! What do I know? > So, is it possible WTC 6 was bombed in some fashion or another? Sure, any explanation is as good as the next when the facts are being held hostage. You're making a joke, right, but since you're asking I think they just blew up the building. [pun intended]

To: Don Earl who wrote (9261)	12/14/2004 4:15:02 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 20039

9/11 EVACUATIONS: "Is it odd that Federal employees were evacuated from WTC 6 within 12 minutes of the beginning of the attacks, considering how little effort was made along those lines anywhere else in the complex? Yeah, I'd say so." The Kean-Zelikow Report states that WTC 7 was evacuated sometime after 9:00 AM and prior to 9:30 PM, with the exception of staff in the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management who were ordered to evacuate at 9:30 AM. See Pages 293 and 305 of the Report for discussion. Also, the Kean Report states that an order was issued to evacuate the entire WTC complex at 9:00 AM due to the hazards associated with the North Tower crash and fire, but that the responsible personnel in the South Tower failed to hear the evacuation order due to a radio snafu.