Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter michaelson who wrote (992)	12/21/2004 7:50:30 PM
From: jessie73	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5425

Peter can you clarify or not? Dow Jones has you reversing your testimony several times, because of things like you were sleepy. What really was the nature of those questions to Royer? Is you mind clear now? I see by the post I am replying to that you are concerned that people understand the truth. May I ask you to clarify what Dow Jones has written, you don't even have to stray to outside of what the reporter has already written in the articles. Thanks Here are the snippets from those articles Message 20878773

To: peter michaelson who wrote (992)	12/22/2004 9:45:47 AM
From: manny_velasco	Respond to of 5425

Until then, this talk here is just a bunch of idle, often deceitful and sometimes hurtful bullshit. I had never seen so much bad in people until I came upon the internet....as the saying goes what goes around comes back around to bite you on your arse.

To: peter michaelson who wrote (992)	12/22/2004 10:05:19 AM
From: Louie_al-Arouri	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5425

Did you get the vibe that Elgindy's attorney was incompetent? His own witnesses are bringing in testimony that shows he is a despicable crook and stoolie and it almost appears you've been coached to look like a fool intentionally. Do you feel Tony's attorney is bad, or just the Elgindy defense strategy? They seem to be saying, "look, Tony was caught in illegal short selling schemes, rolled on his associates and agreed to cooperate with the feds to save his own azz, therefore... we the defense contend he is innocent of all counts. Now we will bring SEC agents to the stand to confirm Elgindy was an accomplice and informer." Tuesday afternoon, Elgindy called Yuri Zelinsky, another SEC lawyer, in an attempt to try to impeach part of the testimony of John Sten, a former SEC lawyer. Sten was called by Elgindy's defense last week to testify about how Elgindy provided valuable information to the SEC during an investigation in 1996 and 1997. But on cross-examination, Sten said that Elgindy testified for the SEC as an accomplice in the scheme and that his testimony involved details of his participation in the illegal short-selling scheme that took place at the time. Zelinsky told jurors Tuesday that Elgindy was one of several market makers who agreed to fix the price of a security so that a third party could benefit, backing Sten's testimony that Elgindy was part of a scheme to defraud.