SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (6490)12/26/2004 8:37:33 PM
From: Ed Huang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
BBC report on French secularism

The deep roots of French secularism
news.bbc.co.uk



To: geode00 who wrote (6490)12/27/2004 3:50:36 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Re: Large numbers of American adults are disaffiliating themselves from Christianity and from other organized religions. Since World War II, this process had been observed in other countries, like the U.K., other European countries, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

That is not to reassure me... Indeed, Europeans too have disaffiliated themselves from Christianity and other organized religions, however, unlike Americans, they didn't enroll in freak, pseudo-Christian cults!! Most Europeans have given up on religion altogether. Contrariwise, what has happened in the US is the rise of several pseudo-Christian sects that blend New-Age lunacies with Greek-like mythologies. Take dispentionalism and pre-/post-millennialism for instance: dispentationalists believe that (human) history has unfolded through successive "dispensations" --that's New Age stuff! The Golden Age, the Silver Age, etc. It's Tolkien mythology: the Lord of the Rings mixed with Christian shibboleths... Yet premillennialism and dispensationalism are mainstream... but what of far-right theories such as the pre-Adamite creation of inferior, evil people? (*)

Somehow, I'd prefer Americans to stick with the good old "organized religions" rather than embrace crypto-racist cults such as mentioned in Carol Swain's latest book (**) or Timothy Weber's:

Conclusion

Since the end of the Six-Day War, then, dispensationalists have increasingly moved from observers to participant-observers. They have acted consistently with their convictions about the coming last days in ways that make their prophecies appear to be self-fulfilling. It would be too easy—and completely unwarranted—to conclude that American prophecy believers are responsible for the mess the world is in, that their beliefs have produced the current quagmire in the Middle East. Given the history of the region, the long-standing ethnic and religious hatreds there, and the attempt of many nations, both Western and Arab, to carry out their own purposes in the Holy Land, it is easy to imagine the current impasse even if John Nelson Darby and his views had never existed.

But dispensationalist views have existed for a long time, and they have had their effects on generations of Bible believers in America and elsewhere. As Paul Boyer has pointed out, dispensationalism has effectively conditioned millions of Americans to be somewhat passive about the future and provided them with lenses through which to understand the course of world events. Thanks to the sometimes changing perspectives of their Bible teachers, dispensationalists are certain that trouble in the Middle East is inevitable, that nations will war against nations, and that the time is coming when millions of people will die as a result of nuclear war, the persecution of the Antichrist, or divine judgment. Striving for peace in the Middle East, in other words, is a hopeless pursuit with no chance of success.

At the time of this writing, President George W. Bush and allies in the international community have suggested a road map to peace in the Middle East. The plan includes what many people believe are attainable steps that will lead to the founding of a Palestinian state and new levels of security for Israel. In the early stages of the peace process, there seemed to be signs that both sides had finally had enough of the cycles of bloodletting that have characterized the region for decades. Christian, Jewish, and Muslim groups voiced support and hope that this peace process might succeed where so many previous ones failed.

Not everyone is pleased with the prospects of peace. Militants on both sides do not accept the terms of the road map. Some Israelis, especially those who have settled in occupied territory, are unwilling to turn over land they believe God gave to Abraham and his descendants. Some Palestinians are adamant that Israel must not only relinquish all the land occupied in 1967 but also return territory won in the Israeli war for independence in 1948. They do not want a Jewish state in Palestine and have sworn to keep fighting until Israel no longer exists.

For the dispensational community, the future is determined. The Bible's prophecies are being fulfilled with amazing accuracy and rapidity. They do not believe the road map will—or should—succeed. According to the prophetic texts, partitioning is not in Israel's future, even if the creation of a Palestinian state is the best chance for peace in the region. Peace is nowhere prophesied for the Middle East until Jesus comes and brings it himself. The worst thing the United States, the European Union, Russia, and the United Nations can do is force Israel to give up land for a peace that will never materialize this side of the second coming. Anyone who pushes for peace in such a manner is ignoring or defying God's plan for the end of the age.

What dispensationalists are willing to do about the current peace process remains to be seen. Will they decide to oppose George W. Bush, who is probably the most popular president among evangelicals ever, or will they use their considerable political power to stop the process before it begins, if they can? What would happen if dispensationalists decided to follow the command of Jesus to be peacemakers and left the results to God? That last alternative seems to have few advocates at the present time.

The evidence shows that in the last thirty-five years, dispensationalists have believed that faithfulness to God demands that they actively support the plan. Such support has taken many forms, from lobbying the U.S. government to guarantee that pro-Israel policies remain strong, to helping Jews in the former Soviet Union immigrate to the land of promise, to traveling to the Holy Land in large numbers and marching in the streets of Jerusalem to show solidarity, to contributing financially and in other ways to Israeli settlements in the so-called occupied territories, to promoting views considered extreme and dangerous by most Israelis, to using scientific expertise to engineer a perfect red heifer to speed the building of the temple so that Jesus can return. Much to everyone's surprise, dispensationalists have become Israel's best friends, it’s most fierce and unwavering supporters, at the same time that they have tried to convert as many Jews as possible to the Christian faith.

One should not expect this pattern of behavior to change anytime soon. It seems clear that dispensationalism is on a roll, that its followers feel they are riding the wave of history into the shore of God's final plan. Why should they stop or change course? Why should they climb back into the stands when being on the field of play is so much more fun and apparently so beneficial to the game's outcome? As a Bridges for Peace's advertisement read, "Don't just read about prophecy when you can be part of it."


This article is adapted from the book On the Road to Armageddon by Timothy P. Weber.
Published by Zondervan.
©2004 Timothy P. Weber


christiancounterculture.com

(*) bethuneinstitute.org
(**) amazon.com