Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (1393)	12/29/2004 2:11:38 AM
From: lucky_girl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Janice, I read two columns written by Christine Tatum this evening. She actually met you and verifies that you are who you claim to be. :-))) You’re quite a character! I mean that in the nicest way. You come across as a very interesting person. Have you written down your experiences in some place other than on the web? I think your life, especially since 1996, would make a very interesting book/movie. Janice, what I share with the poster who calls himself Louie is the conviction that Elgindy is going to be going to trial for much more than the present RICO charge. I don’t know Louie and I don’t know anyone named Dobry. I did read a bit this evening about your past relationship with Dobry. I have seen Dobry's web site. Janice, you read my post about Bill’s address, which you have indicated is incorrect; did you miss the other two posts? The Adams vs. The United States appeal puts the brakes on Tony’s claim that only Cleveland handled money and or communications with Royer. Tony seems to think that if a ‘middle’ man does all the ‘dirty’ work it gets him off scott free. Adams vs. The United States says this is not the case. "In an appeals case Adams vs. The United States the finding was: “Appeals for the Third Circuit held that, to be convicted of conspiracy to violate 1962(c), a defendant need only agree to the commission of two predicate acts of racketeering activity, and need not agree to personally commit those acts. 759 F.2d 1099, 1116 (1985)”." (check posts 1225 and 1226) As I am sure you know that means he only had to agree to Cleveland passing on the money to Royer, and he only had to agree to listen to Cleveland tell him what Royer said was in the FBI database, and then act on the information he was told by Cleveland. It is irrelevant if the information can be obtained in a public forum on the web or elsewhere. The fact that he heard or read the information that had been obtained from the FBI priority database just hours before, and then he posted it on the web himself to his paying subscribers, is what really counts as far as the court is concerned. Remember the party in Balley’s? FBI business cards stuck to the guest’s foreheads. That was a visual the jury will not forget. That’s how it goes. Also, if you have not had the time to research it the rewritten RICO is such that if the case is not won the first time around it can be retried at a future date. In other words, Tony can never go back to doing what he has been doing. If God holds him in the palm of his hand, and he walks free he will have to find some other means of supporting his family. Right now in the present trial all that is needed is one count of one of the charges brought against him to stick, and the terrorism charges will be opened. That’s how the new RICO was formulated after 9/11. I know I jumped ahead on that one. I feel quite confident that at least 1 count of one charge will stick. Janice, RICO is the ultimate grand daddy of all felony charges that a person can be charged with. It is not a cease and desist type lawsuit that you have experienced. (I have been reading about your exploits) Janice, I really don’t know what your relationship with Elgindy was before he was arrested. If he was a friend then I am sorry you have to witness all that has passed and all that is to come. Janice, consider writing that book about your life! P.S. Can I ask your opinion on a stock? Do you have a chat board? .