Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WWWWWWWWWW who wrote (70152)	12/30/2004 8:54:16 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Amen, and speaking of punting my Bucs are in deep poo-poo. Oh well.... next year. :•)

To: WWWWWWWWWW who wrote (70152)	12/30/2004 9:21:18 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Anyone who is repetitive and intentionally disruptive, without attempting to advance the discussion, should be punted IMO What does that mean? "Advancing the discusiion" hardly requires that a hyperbiased web link be provided with every post. The Founders were intensely disruptive from the British POV. Maybe "disruptive" is really a political decision, not a behavioral one. SOROS is well known to have made quite a few messes of his own. He is hardly in a "cast the first stone" position. Anyone who is repetitive and intentionally disruptive, without attempting to advance the discussion, should be punted IMO. Who is the judge of that? You? SOROS? And what are the standards? As I pointed out in PM, fella, if you don't like the current threads, you are welcome to start your own. I even gave you a themem and offered to supply material to get it started.