Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (89134)	1/5/2005 2:24:47 AM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

since the defense seemed to make a better case for the prosecution than the prosecution did, I would say there has to be one confused jury. It will be interesting to see how long the jury is out on this one.

To: Dale Baker who wrote (89134)	1/5/2005 1:24:13 PM
From: Edscharp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Dale, "If the prosecution can connect all the dots in their case, the only tactic left for their defense is the "well it was legal anyway" theme or the even lamer "well we thought it was OK even if it wasn't"." I'm not sure. Royer seemingly suggested in his statement that he didnt' know what Mr. Elgindy going to use the information for. For an FBI agent this is a surprising lack of curiosity. Didn't they both profit from the information....or did I misread?