Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (15136)	1/6/2005 7:58:33 AM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 20773

You strike me as the sort who adheres to an ideology first and then tries out facts to see if they conform. I tend to be the opposite sort. I want to know the facts before I reach my conclusions. Absolutely untrue. It is you, if anyone, who makes completely unfounded - indeed, in many cases, eminently refutable - claims, only to retreat shamelessly when confronted. See... Message 20904144 ...and, more recently, Message 20907904 e

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (15136)	1/6/2005 3:35:08 PM
From: Yogizuna	Respond to of 20773

You have a right to your opinion about me or anything else, no matter how inaccurate it may be.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (15136)	1/7/2005 8:09:53 PM
From: Yogizuna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

OK, have your facts on a silver platter. skfriends.com Keep in mind the WTC towers were hit by very heavy jets at high speeds, causing substantial damage to the supporting columns and probably even the steel core before the hot fires got going, and it was not only jet fuel, but paper, plastic and all of the other things in the offices that contributed to the temperature of the fire. Also, the fire was most likely hotter on the side of the towers where the paper, furniture, plastic material, etc, had been "plowed" by the tremendous impacts... So once again, you are comparing "apples to oranges" with your "similar but not identical" skyscraper fires.