Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (1749)	1/7/2005 12:48:53 AM
From: ravenseye	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5425

If you want to consider May 2002 information more relevant than what has been reported about the current trial which started November 2004, that is your choice. I however put more weight on what the jury has heard, not what was written in a news article over 2 years ago. A lot can happen in two years. I mean really, if tony wasn't scared of being found guilty he surely wouldn't have used a fake id last year April resulting in his current living conditions in a detention center compared to his $2.2 million dollar home. What the jury has heard, and how they process what they heard is what matters. If I were you, I'd be concerned if more indictments are handed down. You seem to want to go in devious circles, putting more faith in the past than current events better known as the trial. I will end your tail chasing by again mentioning my comments and what ERIC DASH reported about 11/09/04: Judge Raymond J. Dearie is who said "This case has nothing to do with terrorism," he said to the jury in a planned set of instructions. "You will hear no evidence that Mr. Elgindy or others were involved in 9/11." That doesn't mean there isn't evidence! Prior to the judges instructions Mr. Cleveland had responded to Kenneth Breen that the investigation was related to "terrorism," after being asked about a mid-September 2001 F.B.I. investigation into Mr. Elgindy. ERIC DASH also reported ...Mr. Cleveland was allowed to continue with his testimony, recounting how he learned that Mr. Elgindy was a subject in a criminal investigation. Mr. Cleveland said that Jeffrey A. Royer, an F.B.I. agent who was the source of that information and a defendant in the case, told him that investigators were looking into $6 million that Mr. Elgindy had liquidated from two brokerage companies, Charles Schwab and Salomon Smith Barney, shortly before Sept. 11. Mr. Royer also relayed information that the government was examining the money Mr. Elgindy gave to Mercy International, which Mr. Breen described as a "Middle Eastern charity." Mr. Royer promised to "keep an eye" on the case, Mr. Cleveland testified, "and as new things came out, he would let me know." .... suite101.com Mr Breen the prosecutor must have some solid information to say money was given to Mercy International, and specifically stated it was a MIDDLE EASTERN charity. I personally wouldn't give more credence to a news item dated May 2002 than current court records. That is a big gap of time, May 2002 to November 2004, and I bet there has been more information found, and I feel confident that Mr Breen knows more than you!