SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (155841)1/10/2005 12:38:26 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I disagree. I believe AM was for 2000 accord. He plays in a dangerous neighborhood and plays to his base much like W with the religous right and the Dems to moveon.org. Of course the Pal base has committed horrific acts but it will take one of their own to get them to reform their ways. Who cares why he stops terror along as its stopped. The lesson to the west is that terror can be stopped if the terrorists are crushed. Good less for Israeli governments of the future as well as for the US. Iraqis will have to deal with this as well. Am i optimisitc about an I-P settlement no, just a bit more hopeful that the groundwork that is being laid today--end of Infitada and Israel pullout from gaza are both good first states even if both sides still viscerally hate each other. Mike



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (155841)1/10/2005 3:05:55 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 281500
 
And Sharon is little miss muffet -- move forward or lose US support. That is what we should say to BOTH Israel and the Palestinians, although our support is so overwhelmingly lopsided now that it might make little difference to the Palestinians.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News