Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (25949)	1/11/2005 6:11:10 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

a recount by your narrow definition might be only to count ballots that have already been counted, though I question the need to count ballots that have already been counted. That's a very reasonable, standard definition -- not narrow at all. In fact, it's you who are inconsistent, since you argued here a few days ago (without proof) that even machines don't come up with the same count twice. Sometimes people forget to sign in. And sometimes they forget to sign in a second, third, and even fourth time. by law, every ballot needs to be counted, even ballots that missed a first count by error. Every VALID ballot needs to be counted -- excluding those that were invalidated pursuant to the rules the first time around but casually thrown into the hopper by the democrats on the second or third go-round. There go the democrats again -- changing the rules in the middle of an election.