Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (214710)	1/11/2005 10:03:49 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574122

>However, then when it comes to social security you want to impose your views on everyone, instead of letting all of us have a choice as to whether we participate or not. Very inconsistent. It's a system that cannot work unless everyone participates. -Z

To: RetiredNow who wrote (214710)	1/12/2005 7:11:22 AM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1574122

re: John, you and the other liberals say it is wrong to impose religious views on everyone. Thus, you advocate for seperation of church and state, and I agree. However, then when it comes to social security you want to impose your views on everyone, instead of letting all of us have a choice as to whether we participate or not. Very inconsistent. 1st, I'm not impassioned on the church/state debate, you must be thinking of someone else or lying about my position again. 2nd, I thought you were the one that wanted to take SS as a separate issue, and not compare it to any others. 3rd, church state is a freedom issue not a financial issue. Apples and oranges. You are really stretching to find an analogy. Just look at the cold, hard facts; with the current deficit we can't afford private accounts. Why are you "conservatives" always inventing new ways to spend more government money? John