Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (156269)	1/14/2005 2:46:36 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

What happened, happened. What is, is. Pals need to lose terrorism even if it means they have to take action against some of their own. If thats done, israelis need to go back to the future and that means back to 1967 borders with mutually agreed to adjustments as well as something creative regarding the big "J".

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (156269)	1/14/2005 2:53:21 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Few nations contest Israel's legitimate interests in the pre 1967 Israel. False. Most Arab countries, and Iran, do not recognize Israel inside any borders. Nor does Hamas, of course, unless one is writing for the New York Times. Nor does Abu Mazen's Fatah, according to its new head Khaddoumi, or the Al Aqsa brigades. While Israel was still inside the 1967 borders, not a single Arab country recognized it. If they really recognized Israel as a permanent country, they wouldn't be trying to get the "right of return" for 5 million "refugees" to that other, permanent country. No nation builder wants his nation's people to wind up in some other country. Is Germany lobbying for the "right of return" to Koenigsburg so that millions of Germans can become Russians? Of course not.