Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (89447)	1/19/2005 12:12:01 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Apparently the jury is mulling over the same issues we are: Message 20963190 - Jeff

To: Dale Baker who wrote (89447)	1/19/2005 3:58:07 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

if Peters said he was acting for Elgindy and Royer passed information to Elgindy, doesn't Elgindy look very much like someone involved in ongoing conspiracies? I think that's a hard question to answer without a full transcript of the trial testimony. Did Peters testify? He's being tried separately, and claims innocence, so presumably he has another account of the story. Though I think he'll find it rather hard to get round those phone tapes. As to whether he was "acting for" Elgindy, that's the jury's call. Depends on who they want to believe. From what I've read, it appears that Royer mostly communicated with Cleveland, and that Cleveland made a lot of stuff up. Is he a credible witness? Again, that's up to the jury to decide.