SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (27115)1/19/2005 4:11:56 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 90947
 
Saddam was not our special project. Saddam was a problem of the entire world. We needed to work in concert with our allies. But beyond that we needed to underscore the war on terror by getting to Al Qaeda and bin Laden

Wrong again. Saddam was shooting at our guys, our planes. Saddam was in violation of the '91 accords won with US blood and treasure and the hunt for Bin Laden has never abated.....

You're full of crap as usual, wussy boy......

J.



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (27115)1/19/2005 8:43:43 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
We were already using force on Iraq. We had Saddam boxed in between the no-fly zones and our aircraft could bomb Iraq anytime they wanted. All Saddam had was some old anti-aircraft guns. I doubt if our aircraft had even the tiniest of damage during those sorties. Surely none of them was downed or even hit severely.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News