Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (2456)	1/24/2005 3:10:22 PM
From: olivier asser	Respond to of 5425

AUSA has now laid the groundwork for further indictments, and I can tell you from my perspective this is one legal precedent that helps shed light on my own Texas federal court RICO claims against other so-called leaders in our industry. I'm very incredibly grateful to Kenneth Breen and his staff today. Mind control, Scott, straight out of Orwell, anyone who disagrees is banned. That way, and through the fictitious identities, you create the illusion of a balanced discussion leading to only one conclusion: trust that particular messenger. TJ, jenna, AP, Berber and others all used these kinds of methods to lend support to enterprise schemes.

To: Smiling Bob who wrote (2456)	1/24/2005 3:22:10 PM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 5425

>>Right now, and why I'm very interested in this case, is that a US Attorney is finally standing up for those who were defrauded through an IA site and SI by a RICO enterprise. From what I've seen, most if not all of the case was made on the basis of what occurred on his private site, not what happened on public message boards. Did I read that right? 300 subscribers at $600 per month? Wow, that was some serious cash flow!