SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (90010)1/26/2005 12:07:14 AM
From: Man on the moon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
However, in this case and in most high profile cases, the prosecutors know their stuff so posts that they "had it out for someone," or that they had no idea how the stock business operates, are just absurd, and that's being polite.

don't put words in my mouth. There are so many ingredients in this trial that there is no way it can summarized like that.

If what I say doesn't make sense to you, then just forget it.



To: rrufff who wrote (90010)1/26/2005 8:43:41 AM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
gotta take you to task on this one. breen's use of 911 to hurt elgindy was imo a CLEAR abuse of power. nothing more than a cheap trick typically used in civil cases by bottom dwelling attorneys. the ausa should behave and be held to a higher standard.

that said, i do not doubt breen knows the issues surrounding this case. in the one and only call i have had with him, (months ago), he brought up, from memory a number of old posts and from emschweiller's book i'd made attacking elgindy. he was VERY well prepared. his strategy seemed to be, get an fbi agent on the call, (so he had a witness), lure me into a sense of confidence, then (my guess from his history), get me to tell a white lie about this or that so he could charge me with obstruction and use the pressure of the charge to get me to do a bob hansen. luckily i'd done my homework on him beforehand so i didn't fall prey to the game. it was a very short call.

>>>However, in this case and in most high profile cases, the prosecutors know their stuff so posts that they "had it out for someone," or that they had no idea how the stock business operates, are just absurd, and that's being polite.



To: rrufff who wrote (90010)1/27/2005 3:57:06 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 122087
 
This was a high profile case.

Not really. I think it was chiefly of interest to people who "knew" Tony on the message boards.