SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : AP's Crime -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: peter michaelson who wrote (21)1/27/2005 1:03:33 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78
 
Personally, I think if something is available on the internet in normal channels, then it is public at that point. It may have been private before.

Now - to add some weasel scenarios to the above -

Let's say someone publishes something on a website that the public can't get to, e.g., password or hidden from google, then that may not be public information. (I understand but don't know the particulars, that there are ways of hiding websites and sections from google and other search engines.)

Getting back to the charge, don't forget you're taking a piece out of a very long and boring document. The issue of what is the law as based on the trial and the issue of what will happen on appeal cannot be determined from a lone paragraph.

As you probably know by now, law is not precise. One of the reasons people hate lawyers, (yes, way down on the long list) is that they usually answer questions with "it depends."



To: peter michaelson who wrote (21)2/3/2005 7:23:06 AM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78
 
anything new on the actual charges ap & royer were found guilty?