SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
AP's Crime
An SI Board Since January 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
78 35 0
Emcee:  peter michaelson Type:  Moderated
I am starting this thread to have a mature rational discussion of AP's conviction and the specifics of the crimes of which he was convicted and not convicted.

I want to avoid getting into unending arguments with kooky people, but I welcome different opinions if they can be argued rationally.

I will be banning anyone who cannot stay more or less on topic, who is not willing to concede a point under any circumstances, who has an obvious axe to grind etc etc.

The goal is to have a comprehensive discussion about the legal aspects of shorting and scambusting - what is legal and what is NOT LEGAL.

Please post information from Tony's trial and specifically related topics, even if this information has been posted elsewhere already.

Thanks, Peter
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
78Why was the poster nycnpbbkr who posted this thread banished?ravenseye-3/4/2006
77Message Boards | Overvalued Stocks : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthoravenseye-2/27/2006
76It didn't take a year for me to respond, your question was in February. Plusravenseye-1/19/2006
75it took you a year to come up with that response?Pluvia-1/18/2006
74August 1, 2005 Contacts: Robert Nardoza United States Attorney's Office ravenseye-1/6/2006
73anything new on the actual charges ap & royer were found guilty?Pluvia-2/3/2005
72Subject 34696Smiling Bob-1/30/2005
71Correction, 7 figures should be 6. Damn inflation, couple hundred thousand ain&#nycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
70Peter was just as intimidating as tony was.... Seems both Peter and Tony were lnycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
69i think peter was smarter and going for the one big hit whilest tony was a pilfeBear Down-1/28/2005
68Try the name of mary in red.manny_velasco-1/28/2005
67Have to disagree with you. I believe if you read the summaries and then think arrufff-1/28/2005
66I remember something about a guy who went with him and they had a falling out, irrufff-1/28/2005
65in that case you are mistaken, we never met. <i> >>Never wear shortPluvia-1/28/2005
64Never wear short dresses, personally I fancy long dresses and I rarely talk abounycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
63were you the guy with the ecnc position? or the girl in the short dress. if tPluvia-1/28/2005
62We spoke many years ago, npb=Newport Beach, you recall?nycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
61sounds *intriguing*... we should meet, i'll bring a breath mint <i> Pluvia-1/28/2005
60Interesting question Bear, Pluvia, how do you feel Tosto's crimes compare tonycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
59please wish peter a happy anniversary tomorrow. It is the 6th anniversary of thBear Down-1/28/2005
58I have a *krush* on all people who get off the couch and attempt to make things nycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
57sounds like you still have a *krush* on him. any romantic plans for the futurePluvia-1/28/2005
56You think Tony was interesting, Tosto wrote the book. Cash, I don't know anynycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
55With that said, I recall a "doctor" posting here years ago at SI aboutnycnpbbkr-1/28/2005
54still only 1 week before the halt. So was the whole first 3 weeks peter tradinBear Down-1/28/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):