SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Janice Shell who wrote (90332)1/28/2005 12:56:40 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
I believe your reading a bit more into those summaries. It seemed pretty clear to me that unless a block of stock at a discount was provided, the short attack would continue.

So you're saying that it's common practice for shorts to get discounted shares or free shares to call off their attack? And of course by attack, I don't just mean the actual act of shorting. The message board attack by guru and followers pretty much stopped at that point. And so did the threats of SEC action, etc.

Again, imagine if a tout answered as you have posted. You'd be lollisssimo'ing all over the place.



To: Janice Shell who wrote (90332)1/28/2005 12:58:14 AM
From: olivier asser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Not all short-sellers make public and private statements designed to instill fear in the CEO of the targeted company.

Shortsellers have long been willing to accept stock to cover. I think that's wrong, but it isn't extortion.