Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (9783)	1/31/2005 5:34:55 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Hi Don, It seems that we're circling back on some of our previous discussions. :) The video and still photos you've provided in the post I'm replying to seem to be of such low quality that I have decided to suspend judgement as to what they purport to represent. This is the sort of low quality video from which nightmares, rather than evidence, can be drawn. *** I'm far more certain that the intelligent discussion such as is being offered such excellent researchers as Dr. David Ray Griffin. I've recently acquired this excellent DVD: septembereleventh.org We will soon be showing this at our local college at a large public event. I encourage others to do the same. Best, Ray

To: Don Earl who wrote (9783)	2/8/2005 8:52:16 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Going back to a previous discussion on the Naudet tape, I just received the copy I ordered. This gif most closely displays what's on the original. bigrosebang.com The flash and violent ejection of debris takes place a fraction of a second before impact. The sequence is bang crash, not crash bang. The side of the building very definitely exploded outward just before the plane hit, and the "flash" on the version I have is your typical signature white hot HE detonation. The flashlight type circle isn't visible on the version I received, which probably means I'm going to have to try tracking down the other version if I can find one available. So far I've only had time to fast forwarded to the impact footage and haven't had a chance to view the tape from start to finish. I'll follow this up if I run across any other items of interest. I'd have to say the frames just before impact constitute a smoking gun. The explosion took place inside the building, which pretty well shoots hell out of the official story. Assuming the NIST pieces of steel are in fact from the site of impact, as stated on the NIST site, the outward bending of the columns supports that the force was from the inside out, not from the outside in.