Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ravenseye who wrote (2738)	2/3/2005 3:32:34 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

No mention of Mike Hunt -- one of the top analysts covering the issue? You should dig deeper into that one. Something might turn up. "Could be a different con call, no mention of Mike Hunt"

To: ravenseye who wrote (2738)	2/3/2005 11:37:26 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 5425

Why is Mike Hunt not in the TERN complaint? What are they hiding?

To: ravenseye who wrote (2738)	2/3/2005 11:46:25 AM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

it was the same call. don't believe everything you read. Unfortunatly the feds did nothing when millions and millions of dollars worth of stock were sold by the ceo, his brother and the cfo. THey sold the day after Cable-labs issued the cease and desist letter to TERN. That letter was certainly not public information. So we have a case that allegedly has more attempts at manipulation than any of tony's little shit stocks, yet no RICO charge or manipulation charge. A case of more insider selling than martha stewart ever even thought about yet no insider selling charges and no disgorgement. A case that made national newspapers and is still in court on civil issues but not a single criminal charge. Guess the feds were too busy.