Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671182)	2/4/2005 12:43:23 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

So what? Looks like Bush has done pretty good to get to Clinton's average (assuming you are telling the truth) considering 9-11, the bursting of the tech bubble, corporate scandals and the relentless dishonest and un-American attacks by the democratic party (and their hacks like you). I say 5.2% ain't bad.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671182)	2/4/2005 1:03:42 PM
From: DizzyG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Your AVERAGE unemployment number is incorrect, Kenneth... Please see this link: rescueamericanjobs.org This lists the US monthly unemployment rate from 1964 through 2003. The years in question are 1993 through 2000. Here are the average rates for each of those years: 1993: 7.38 1994: 6.59 1995: 6.06 1996: 5.83 1997: 5.37 1998: 4.86 1999: 4.58 2000: 4.34 So, we sum these up and then divide by 8... Sum of Unemployment Rates /8 = Average Unemployment Rate for Clinton 45/8 = 5.63% Average Unemployment Rate - The Clinton Years. You are wrong again, Kenneth. Time to get a new talking point. :) Diz-